lynkmi

Mattsclancy / Peer Review

0 followers

· RSS

log in

The strain on scientific publishing (direct.mit.edu)

·

·
57 days ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×

Mattsclancy / Scale ×
Judging the Paper by Its Cover: Affiliation Bias in Conference Admissions (papers.ssrn.com)

·

·
63 days ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
[2411.11437] Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing (arxiv.org)

·

·
77 days ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
AI-assisted prescreening of biomedical research proposals: ethical considerations and the pilot case of “la Caixa” Foundation | Data & Policy | Cambridge Core (cambridge.org)

·

·
3 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×

Mattsclancy / AI + Innovation ×
The early days of peer review: five insights from historic reports (nature.com)

·

·
3 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×

Mattsclancy / I should read ×
Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review (journals.plos.org)

·

·
4 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
Scientometrics: Are reviewer scores consistent with citations? (link.springer.com)

·

·
4 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society | Oxford Academic (academic.oup.com)

·

·
4 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications (pnas.org)

·

·
4 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS (link.springer.com)

·

·
4 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees (osf.io)

·

·
7 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
Blinded Versus Unblinded Review: A Field Study Comparing the Equity of Peer-Review – BFI (bfi.uchicago.edu)

·

·
7 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Blinding ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×
Meta-Research: Blinding reduces institutional prestige bias during initial review of applications for a young investigator award | eLife (elifesciences.org)

·

·
7 months ago
· discuss

Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun ×

Mattsclancy / Blinding ×

Mattsclancy / Peer Review ×

views: 268