lynkmi
Mattsclancy
/
Peer Review
0 followers
×
·
RSS
login
close
clear all notifications
The strain on scientific publishing
(
direct.mit.edu
)
·
11 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Mattsclancy / Scale
×
Judging the Paper by Its Cover: Affiliation Bias in Conference Admissions
(
papers.ssrn.com
)
·
18 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
[2411.11437] Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
(
arxiv.org
)
·
31 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
AI-assisted prescreening of biomedical research proposals: ethical considerations and the pilot case of “la Caixa” Foundation | Data & Policy | Cambridge Core
(
cambridge.org
)
·
44 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Mattsclancy / AI + Innovation
×
The early days of peer review: five insights from historic reports
(
nature.com
)
·
64 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Mattsclancy / I should read
×
Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review
(
journals.plos.org
)
·
84 days ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Scientometrics: Are reviewer scores consistent with citations?
(
link.springer.com
)
·
3 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society | Oxford Academic
(
academic.oup.com
)
·
3 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
(
pnas.org
)
·
3 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS
(
link.springer.com
)
·
3 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees
(
osf.io
)
·
5 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Blinded Versus Unblinded Review: A Field Study Comparing the Equity of Peer-Review – BFI
(
bfi.uchicago.edu
)
·
5 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Blinding
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
Meta-Research: Blinding reduces institutional prestige bias during initial review of applications for a young investigator award | eLife
(
elifesciences.org
)
·
5 months ago
·
discuss
Mattsclancy / New Things Under the Sun
×
Mattsclancy / Blinding
×
Mattsclancy / Peer Review
×
views: 184