New Things Under the Sun
I should read
AI + Innovation
Peer Review
Immigration
Teams
Misery Project
Search Space
Backgrounds of Innovators
On Culture
Counter-Reformation
Dangerous Progress
Publication Bias
Commercialization
Distant Spillovers
Open Access
Training
Diffusion
Gender
History of Growth
Modeling the Creative Process
Movies
Predicting Technology
Reproducibility
State Capacity
Valuing Innovation
Artistic Progress
Discrimination
Living Well
Markets and Innovation
Novelty
Science to Industry
Stagnation
Transmission of Excellence
Videos
Big Questions
Citations
Fraud in Science
Good lists
Market Power
Music
Progress Studies
Proximity
Replication Reports
Specialization
Tenure
Age
Blinding
China
Combination
Culture of Innovation
Funding Impact
Funding Innovation
Methodology
Retractions
Scale
Steering Research
Abundance Political Economy
Academics Don't Care About Money
Grant Design
Industrial Revolution
Innovation case studies
Journals
Learning Curves
LMIC Science Policy
Many Teams
Patents
Photography
Population
Prestige
Priority
Pull Policy
R&D Cost
R&D Tax Credits
Remote Work
Risk Aversion
Science Fiction
War
Profile RSS
First, commenters at public meetings are unrepresentative of the public along racial, gender, age, and homeownership lines; second, distance to the proposed development predicts commenting behavior, but only among those in opposition; third, commission votes are correlated with commenters’ preferences; finally, the alignment of White commenters (vs. other racial groups) and neighborhood group representatives and the general public (vs. other interest groups) better predict project approvals.
Politicians love spending away from reformed civil service, resulting in lower overall investment?
Theory paper on when reform raises welfare